First, the cited study here is garbage from a well-known pay-to-play journal. They also list some significant limitations in their study that all point toward the 2-dose+ numbers being unreliable. But that’s not why I’m here.
I’m here because these clowns don’t know the difference between a 37% difference in life expectancy (that would be approximately 30 years) and a 37% difference in the change in life expectancy, which is relative to the change in the control group. If the control group’s change in life expectancy is one year, then the change in life expectancy would be 0.37 years. Quite a difference!
Not only do they have shitty sources, they also can’t do maths!