oc
Pretending ten seconds from one hallway defines the entirety of J6
It’s almost as if at other places or other times, these and other people might have been behaving differently.
Mind-blowing, I know. 🤯
Presenting election interference as “mockery”
Here are two of the posts he was convicted for:
I’m not surprised that Tucker chose not to show the posts’ actual content. It seems they would have been a critical piece of the story to share for any journalist worth their salt, but let’s not pretend Tucker is a journalist.
I’m not sure what Tucker is suggesting is mocking here (“The First Amendment is done. Douglass Mackey is about to go to prison for mocking Hillary Clinton on the internet.”). Note that the second counterfeit ad above says “paid for by Hillary for president,” a clear attempt to mislead. Tucker says, “Hillary Clinton […] dismisses out of hand that you have a first amendment right to make fun of her.” He goes on to quote Clinton: “people say all kinds of things about us, but his went from running a very deliberate effort to mislead people about where and how to vote in an effort to subvert the election.”
Ironically, this Clinton quote is the most sane thing said about the situation in the entire interview.
A jury of his peers found him guilty.
This was Douglass Mackey’s second conviction for attempting to suppress votes, the first being in 2016.
“People who think 1/6 is a real issue are just gaslighting us.”
Anyone taking 1/6 seriously is just gaslighting. It’s an incredible, self-centered claim.
They’re not stopping it. When will America be destroyed? I’ll check back in a year. My money says America will not be destroyed. 🤷🏻♂️
How would they go about stopping it? Sounds like violent rhetoric to me.
You are lots of things that you are not qualified to define
The context: A Supreme Court nominee was asked to define “woman”, to which she responded, “I am not a biologist”.
This is a silly word game. Many things are easy to demarcate for some or most cases, but very difficult, if not impossible, to define on the boundary. Just because it’s easy to categorize you doesn’t mean that the boundary is easy to define.
(Self-centered, again.)
A more nuanced, serious discussion: https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-science-of-biological-sex/
18 months later and no chemical weapon attack. Go figure.
It was such a bad prediction that the OP deleted their post.
My friends sister says…
Hearsay is a dangerous drug.
The original post, which has been removed:
